Wednesday, August 13, 2008

The Dark Knight (2008)

The Good:

Batman still watches over Gotham City though the police force has orders to arrest him on sight. He and Lieutenant James Gordon are secretly working together to loosen the stranglehold the mob has over the populace. Rachel has moved on with her life and is now involved with Gotham's shiny new District Attorney, Harvey Dent who plans on cleaning up the city his way. Behind closed doors the mob meets to decide what action to take against the 'Bat Man'. Enter, a stranger, dressed in a fugly purple suit. He offers his considerable 'talents' to take care of all their problems. And then things start to get crazy.

The cast of this movie is amazing. Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, Heath Ledger, Aaron Eckhart, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Gary Oldman. They're all perfectly cast. Bale was made for this role, equal parts arrogant playboy and gruff guardian of Gotham. I'm so happy that he's finally getting the due I believe he's long deserved. Ledger is the most psychotic deviant I've met in film and the creepy things he does with his mouth is deliciously unsettling. Eckhart plays the perfect DA, a 'white knight' to root out the deep seated corruption in Gotham City. It also doesn't hurt that his face has a classic 50s All-American look. Gyllenhaal does the role of Rachel Dawes justice, redeeming her character from the disaster of "Batman Begins". And then there's Gary Oldman. What can I say about James Gordon? He comes into his own in this movie and I cannot express how awesome Oldman was in this role.

The script was amazing. I've always believed the story is the most important part of a movie. It's the core of the project and it needs to be solid to make a good movie. The writers did a fantastic job here. The plot has a relentless drive and pulls you in from the word 'go'. The interweaving of storylines seems effortless, the dialogue is clever and believable, the look of the film is dark without being morbid and don't forget the special effects. I'm a big fan of explosions in film and if you are too I promise you won't be disappointed.

The Bad:

I only had three complaints about the film.

One of the characters from "Batman Begins" is brought back for what I saw as only a cameo, an unneeded and unwanted one. It was confusing because I didn't understand the reason for their presence and it only served to complicate the plot.

The jerky camera motion editing that may have given you motion sickness from "Batman Begins" is back. It's not as pronounced but still present and as in the first film, keeps you from seeing what's really going on in some scenes.

My biggest problem was the ending. After the major plot is tied up, the film continues for about another half hour. I understand how the writers may have wanted to resolve some character arcs but it felt somewhat forced. A good example of this would "Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" where most people were half out of their seats because they weren't sure if the last fade out was the end of the movie or not. This tag end could have been saved for the next movie as it would have left rich and various possibilities for the direction of Batman 3. It would have also left a much more satisfying end for the audience.

The Ugly:

Somebody find Eli Wallach.


Rating: 5/5

5 comments:

Seresecros said...

It's great to watch this film as a fan of comics, because you already know the roles of characters like Harvey Dent, and what must happen to them as the film continues. Watching with my friends, who had no idea, it was fantastic to watch their reactions as they realised who the final villain in the film was.

But you're right. I think villain no 3 should've been kept for the third film, really. But have you heard who the next villain will be? My only clue is this:

?

Dark Orpheus said...

I thought the villain for the third film has not been confirmed? Everything is still speculations at the moment. Still, would have preferred it if Harvey Dent would progress to the third film, and maybe - just maybe, we can get Renee Montoya into the story. ;p

Seresecros said...

On second thoughts, perhaps the poster I've seen is a fake. Here it is, I hand it over to your judgement. Real or fake?

http://img177.imageshack.us/my.php?image=riddlerpostercopycopyys0.jpg

Dark Orpheus said...

Seresecros - Oh that poster. According to Cinematical, it's supposed to be a fan-made poster:

http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/14/fan-made-dark-knight-sequel-poster/

theduckthief said...

serescros I was talking about Scarecrow. Totally unnecessary.

I did like how they treated two different villains in one movie because it's been so badly done before. I think this was because Harvey was the DA for most of it.

I really like that poster but I'm pretty sure it's fan made. No one's been announced for the villain and I don't even think they have a script yet.

I do agree with dark orpheus though in that I think he should have been saved to finish off his storyline in the third movie.